01
MATATAG Curriculum Rollout
Phased implementation from 2024 to 2028 simplified K–10 competencies — but still requires lesson planning, assessment, and reporting tooling at division and regional scale.
Reference
2024–2028 phased
For DepEd Schools Division & Regional Offices
A teacher support system built within existing DepEd workflows.
glidED operationalizes DepEd Order No. 42, s. 2016, the MATATAG curriculum, and DepEd Order No. 002, s. 2024 and Order No. 005, s. 2024 — across hundreds of schools, with human-in-the-loop verification on every output.
Built around current DepEd workflows, reporting requirements, and teacher practices in Philippine public schools.
Current Status
glidED is preparing for pilot implementation with selected schools, starting with lesson planning, assessment support, attendance digitization, and DepEd reporting workflows.
K–12
MATATAG K–10
+ Strengthened SHS
RA 10173
Data Privacy Act
compliant
Built within the DepEd policy framework
Every output produced by glidED is anchored to an existing DepEd Order, Memorandum, or Republic Act — not a vendor specification.
Reference
DepEd Order No. 42, s. 2016
DLP / DLL Format
Reference
MATATAG Curriculum
K–10 Aligned
Reference
Strengthened SHS
SY 2026–2027 Ready
Reference
Three-Term Calendar
SY 2026–2027 Native
Reference
DO 002 & 005, s. 2024
Workload Rationalized
Reference
RA 10173
Data Privacy Compliant
§ 00 — The Reform Window
Four reforms. One school year. glidED is built for this transition moment.
SY 2026–2027 is not an ordinary school year. Four simultaneous policy shifts — curriculum, SHS restructure, calendar, and commission findings — demand a coordinated operational response at division and regional scale.
02
Strengthened SHS Full Implementation
DepEd Memorandum 012, s. 2026 mandates full rollout of the Strengthened Senior High School Curriculum in SY 2026–2027, with revised subject structures and new assessment models across all tracks.
Reference
SY 2026–2027
03
Three-Term School Calendar
DepEd's April 2026 advisory confirms the shift to a three-term calendar beginning SY 2026–2027. This disrupts existing quarterly grading, reporting, and school form workflows across every division.
Reference
Three-term calendar
04
EDCOM II Findings
The Second Congressional Commission on Education identified systemic teacher overload, structural operational inefficiency, and a national learning crisis — explicitly calling for system-level interventions, not isolated tools.
Reference
EDCOM II, 2024
Each reform increases teacher workload in the short term. glidED absorbs that operational friction — so schools can transition without losing classroom time.
Sources: DepEd MATATAG framework · DepEd DM 012, s. 2026 · DepEd Three-Term Calendar Advisory, April 2026 · EDCOM II Final Report, 2024
§ 01 — The Mandate
What DepEd Order No. 002, s. 2024 and Order No. 005, s. 2024 asked of every Regional Office.
The Department's instructions are unambiguous. The constraint is operational: how to deliver them across hundreds of schools, simultaneously, without inflating the very paperwork they are meant to remove.
I.
Reduce non-teaching workload
Free classroom hours that have been displaced by lesson-plan transcription, manual grade computation, and physical record compilation.
Recovered
≈ 7 hrs / week / teacher
II.
Standardize DepEd reporting at scale
Every School Form (SF2, SF5, SF9, SF10) must reconcile across schools, districts, and divisions — without per-school spreadsheet customization.
Reconciled
4 School Forms + DLP/DLL
III.
Preserve curricular integrity
MATATAG-aligned learning competencies must remain intact when AI is introduced into planning, assessment, or remediation workflows.
From DepEd-issued LCs
0 deviations
IV.
Maintain data sovereignty
Learner records, assessment artifacts, and personally identifiable information must remain under school and Department custody at all times — RA 10173 enforced.
End-to-end
RA 10173
Teachers today spend more time on paperwork than teaching — glidED is designed to reverse that.
Every mandate on this page describes what the Department has asked of its teachers. glidED operationalizes those requirements — so the time goes back to learners.
§ 02 — The System
glidED is not new policy. It is existing policy, executed at scale.
Designed as a system-level intervention aligned with EDCOM II recommendations on teacher workload and operational inefficiency — not a standalone app. Each operating principle is traceable to an existing DepEd mandate.
Designed based on actual DepEd workflows, school forms (SF2, SF5, SF9, SF10), and teacher requirements under current policies.
glidED focuses first on the highest-burden teacher workflows before expanding to additional features.
I.
Policy, executed at scale
glidED produces DepEd-compliant outputs by default. Daily Lesson Plans follow DO 42 s. 2016 structure; grade computations apply the correct component weights for every learning area; School Forms reconcile across the division. Supports the transition to the Strengthened Senior High School curriculum (SY 2026–2027).
DO 42 s. 2016MATATAGStrengthened SHS
II.
Specialized agents, not general AI
Each agent is scoped to one DepEd workflow — lesson planning, paper grading, attendance digitization, term reporting — with explicit competency mappings. This is not a chatbot retrofitted to schools.
Scoped toolsAuditable
III.
Human-in-the-loop on every output
High-confidence outputs are auto-verified; low-confidence items are flagged inline for teacher review with confidence scores visible. No low-confidence or externally published output reaches learners, parents, or reports without teacher review or approval.
Confidence scoringAudit trail
IV.
Designed for the classroom that exists today
Teachers continue to use paper attendance sheets, paper exam booklets, and existing textbooks. A mobile photograph is the bridge — glidED adapts to the school, not the other way around.
Offline-firstPhoto intake
Teachers remain in full control of all outputs — every AI-assisted result requires teacher review and approval before final use. No output reaches learners, parents, or official records without teacher sign-off.
§ 03 — Rollout Framework
Three stages. The Department's structure, not ours.
Adoption follows the Department's own organizational layers — school, division, region — so each stage produces the artifacts the next layer requires. No re-platforming between stages.
Stage
Duration
Scope
Stage I
Pilot
8 weeks
2 – 3 schools across 2 selected divisions
Stage II
Division Expansion
1 term
Full rollout in 1 – 2 pilot divisions
Stage III
Regional Standardization
1 school year
Regional standardization across divisions
Stage gates align with the three-term school calendar of SY 2026–2027.
Stage I Focus
Initial pilot implementation begins with the four highest-burden workflows: lesson planning (DLP/DLL), assessment generation and checking, attendance digitization (SF2), and DepEd reporting (SF5, SF9, SF10) — designed for minimal disruption to existing school routines.
Stage I
Pilot
01 / 03
Deliverables
- On-site teacher onboarding (Day 1)
- Photo-based attendance live within 1 week
- First term grade computation produced from real classroom data
- Division-level operational read-out at Week 8
Stage II
Division Expansion
02 / 03
Deliverables
- All teachers in division onboarded with structured cohort training
- SF2, SF5, SF9 reconciled at the division level
- MATATAG-aligned lesson plan library completed for the term
- Schools Division Superintendent dashboard activated
Stage III
Regional Standardization
03 / 03
Deliverables
- Standard onboarding playbook executed across all divisions
- Regional Director's compliance dashboard with division drill-down
- Annual report auto-compiled for Central Office submission
§ 04 — Operational Outcomes
Time recovered, per workflow, per teacher.
Each row maps a recurring teaching workflow to the DepEd output it produces and the operational time it returns to the classroom.
Teacher Reality
A typical public school teacher handles 5 sections with 40–60 students each — resulting in hundreds of papers to check, multiple School Forms to prepare, and daily lesson plans to document every quarter.
This results in an estimated 7+ hours of administrative work per week, per teacher — time taken directly from classroom preparation and learner support.
glidED is designed to reduce this workload while keeping all outputs fully aligned with DepEd requirements and under teacher control.
Projected workflow
| Workflow | Current Practice | With glidED | DepEd Output | Time Recovered |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Term grade computation | 4 – 6 hrs / section | < 5 min review | SF5 · SF9 | ≈ 95% |
Daily lesson plan (DLP) | 1 – 2 hrs | < 1 min draft + review | DO 42 s. 2016 DLP / DLL | ≈ 90% |
Attendance recording | 15 min / class + tally | Photo + 30s confirm | SF2 | ≈ 95% |
Learner permanent record | 1 full day | Auto-generated | SF10 (cumulative) | ≈ 98% |
Periodic test paper grading | 200 papers · ½ day | Photo intake + review | Item analysis report | ≈ 92% |
Methodology: time-on-task estimates are projected from DepEd workflow documentation and comparable school settings. Figures are indicative — pilot validation will confirm actual reduction rates.
§ 05 — Verification
No low-confidence output reaches a learner without a teacher's explicit sign-off.
The verification loop is the load-bearing element of the platform. It is enforced at the data layer — not a policy preference.
01
Confidence Scoring
Every AI extraction carries a confidence score. High-confidence outputs surface as auto-verified; low-confidence items are flagged inline with a yellow marker for the teacher to review and confirm.
02
Inline Teacher Review
Review happens in the teacher's normal workflow — not in a separate moderation queue. The teacher reads, confirms, edits, or overrides, then signs off.
03
Full Audit Trail
Each record retains who generated it, who reviewed it, who approved it, and when — exportable to PDF for division- and regional-level audits.
04
No Unreviewed Output
No AI-generated output reaches external parties until it clears the verification layer — auto-verified for high-confidence, teacher-reviewed for all low-confidence items. The system enforces this at the data layer.
§ 06 — Field Conditions
Built for the CALABARZON classroom that already exists today.
The platform does not assume ideal conditions. It works where sections are crowded, bandwidth is intermittent, and paper is still the operational reality of the school day.
01
Designed for 55-student sections
Public secondary schools across Cavite and Laguna routinely run sections of 50–60 learners. glidED's grading and attendance workflows are sized for that reality — not a 25-student demo classroom.
Avg. class size, Region IV-A secondary
02
Offline-first mobile
The teacher app buffers photographs, attendance sheets, and grade inputs locally. When connectivity returns, data syncs automatically with full reconciliation — no lost work in low-bandwidth corridors.
Queued sync · conflict-safe
03
Paper remains the source of truth
Teachers continue to use existing attendance forms, blue booklets, and DepEd-issued materials. A single photograph lifts the data into glidED — the paper record stays on file as the audit artifact.
Paper-compatible by design
04
Designed for low-bandwidth environments
Designed for school environments where 3G is the ceiling. Image upload, form generation, and report compilation are optimized for the practical network conditions of the region — not a demo environment. Pilot validation is pending.
3G viable · pilot validation pending
§ 07 — Forms & Reports
DepEd-formatted by default — not by plugin.
School Forms, Permanent Records, and Daily Lesson Plans are produced in the formats DepEd already uses. No re-templating for audit; no divergence between what the teacher enters and what the division submits.
Form
Document
Reference
SF 2
Daily Attendance Record
DepEd School Form 2
SF 5
Report on Promotion & Level of Proficiency
DepEd School Form 5
SF 9
Learner's Progress Report Card
DepEd School Form 9
SF 10
Learner's Permanent Record
DepEd School Form 10
DLP / DLL
Daily Lesson Plan / Daily Lesson Log
DO 42 s. 2016 format
§ 08 — Workflows
Five workflows. Each scoped to one DepEd process.
glidED assists teachers through five structured workflows — planning, checking, attendance, reporting, and insights. Each produces a specific DepEd output with teacher verification at every step.
No.
Workflow
What it does
DepEd Output
01
Planning
Drafts Daily Lesson Plans and Logs aligned to MATATAG learning competencies, following DO 42 s. 2016 format. Subject specialists validate before distribution.
DLP / DLL
DO 42 s. 2016 · MATATAG
02
Assessment & Checking
Reads photographed exam booklets, scores against rubric, computes component weights per learning area (30/50/20, 40/40/20, 20/60/20), and flags low-confidence items for teacher review.
Item scores · SF5 · SF9
MATATAG competencies · DepEd grading policy
03
Attendance
Digitizes photographed attendance sheets and reconciles daily records against the class roster — no manual data entry required.
SF2
Daily attendance
04
Reporting
Compiles section-level and subject-level summative reports from verified data into DepEd-formatted school forms, ready for division submission.
SF5 · SF9 · SF10
Permanent record · DepEd reporting
05
Insights
Stage IIDivision-level learning pattern summaries, competency gap mapping, and teacher workload analytics — enabling data-informed decisions at the Schools Division Superintendent level.
Division dashboard
Stage II — pilot validation
Each workflow produces auditable outputs with confidence scores. High-confidence results are auto-verified; lower-confidence items are surfaced for teacher review before any output reaches learners, parents, or official records.
§ 09 — Visibility Tiers
Four tiers of access. Each scoped to its role.
Visibility ascends from the classroom to the regional office — every tier sees what its role requires, and nothing it does not.
Tier I — Executive
Regional Director / Schools Division Superintendent
- Region- and division-level compliance dashboards
- Drill-down from regional aggregates to school-level detail
- Auto-compiled annual reports for Central Office submission
- Audit trail across every AI generation and teacher review
Tier II — School Leadership
School Head / Principal · Master Teacher
- School-wide grading, attendance, and reporting visibility
- MATATAG learning competency coverage by section
- Teacher performance signals — without surveillance overhead
- One-click export of School Forms for division submission
Tier III — Classroom
Teacher
- AI-drafted lesson plans, teacher reviews and signs
- Photo-based grading and attendance
- Inline confidence flags — review what matters, skip what does not
- Mobile-first, offline-capable workflow
Tier IV — Stakeholders
Parents · Learners
- Parent-facing email alerts for grades, attendance, and announcements
- Learner view of grades, attendance, and AI study recommendations
- All communications drafted by AI, signed off by the teacher
- Strict role-based data access — RA 10173 enforced
§ 05 — Pilot Proposal
What happens if you say yes.
Initial implementation can begin with selected schools in your division, starting with the four workflows that carry the highest administrative burden — with minimal disruption to existing routines.
Pilot Implementation (Proposed)
2 – 3 schools.
8 weeks.
4 workflows.
Implementation can begin at any point in the school year.
Selected schools across 1 – 2 divisions in Region IV-A
On-site onboarding on Day 1 — teachers operational within the first week
Division read-out at Week 8 — findings presented to the SDS and division leadership
Designed for minimal disruption — teachers keep using paper; glidED works around it
Coordinated with the Schools Division Office — rollout follows the region → division → school structure
Initial Pilot Workflows
01
Lesson Planning
DLP / DLL generation aligned to DO 42 s. 2016, with MATATAG competency mappings pre-loaded.
DLP / DLL
02
Assessment Generation & Checking
AI-assisted test construction and paper-based grading via photo intake, with confidence-flagged teacher review.
Item analysis
03
Attendance Digitization
Photo-based attendance from existing paper sheets. Auto-reconciled into SF2 without changing teacher routine.
SF2
04
DepEd Reporting
Term grade computation and School Form generation directly from recorded class data — no manual re-entry.
SF5 · SF9 · SF10
glidED focuses first on the highest-burden teacher workflows before expanding to additional features.
Designed to complement existing DepEd systems and reporting processes — not replace them. Compatible with LIS and existing DepEd email and SF reporting workflows.
§ 10 — Governance
Data sovereignty, by architecture.
Custody of learner records remains with the school and the Department at every layer of the system. The platform is the processor; the institution is the controller.
01
Republic Act No. 10173 — Data Privacy Act
All learner data is processed under the Department's lawful basis for performing public-sector education functions. Personal information is encrypted at rest and in transit; access is role-scoped and audit-logged.
02
Schools and the Department retain custody
Records belong to the school and the Department of Education — not to glidED. The platform operates as the processor; the school remains the controller.
03
Full export, no lock-in
Every record — grades, attendance, lesson plans, audit trails — is exportable to PDF and spreadsheet at any time, by any authorized user. No proprietary container.
04
Tenant isolation by school
Data is scoped per school identifier at the database layer. A division administrator sees only their division; a regional director sees aggregated, role-appropriate views — never another region's records.
05
Complementary to existing DepEd systems
Designed to work alongside existing DepEd infrastructure — LIS, DepEd email, and SF reporting workflows — not replace them. glidED surfaces AI-organized data into the forms and formats the Department already uses.
Schedule a Regional Briefing
A 60-minute walkthrough, scoped to your division's reality.
We will present the compliance framework, the three-stage rollout playbook, and a live demonstration grounded in the school sizes and field conditions of your division.
- Compliance map — every glidED feature traced to a DepEd issuance
- Pilot → Division → Regional rollout playbook
- Live demonstration with photo intake, AI extraction, teacher review, and SF / Form generation
- Q&A with glidED’s engineering and education leads